is not authorized by the lack of transparency in monetary subsidies

Appeared in the current property market regulation is in effect a sensitive time, arranged a special capital subsidies talent buyers, there is clearly a "de facto bailout" suspicion and lack of policy and legal point of view of rationality. As a suburb center of Hangzhou, Hangzhou economic development zone, recently arranged a special capital of 100 million Yuan, for in-zone enterprises employee rental assistance and housing subsidies. In accordance with the provisions, housing applicants willMust be purchased within the context of the development zone within 2011 House, belongs to first-time buyer of senior management in a one-time subsidy of $ 100,000. For rental, development zone enterprises 5 Yuan/square meter per month rent subsidy. Positive market regulation is in a delicate stage of policy effects appeared, Hangzhou economic development zone, implementation of this paper instruments, it is normal for "talent of encouraging"Or a" de facto policy to rescue "? Market regulation policy there is no adjustment signs, large and medium-sized property companies prepared to "winter", prices continued to fall in market is expected to have been formed. In this situation, the $ 100 million to shoulder the heavy task of reversing the downturn in the property market as a whole atmosphere. However, you cannot change market expectations, it doesn't mean you can't change policy expected. HangzhouEconomic development zone, the introduction of this measure, no matter what name, but objectively speaking has shown distinct from the property market regulation policy trend. One of the most closely watched a clause--"housing applicants must in 2011, in the context of development zone of commercial housing purchased" even more suspicion: Why worry? Even this tendency is indeed for talent encouragement in their minds, however,We had a not coordination of macroeconomic policies and policies in the region, out of step. This is not in tune, for control policy is in itself a hedge, a discount. More important is to come up with financial subsidies for specific groups of houses also suffered torture about the fair. This $ 100 million fund from where? After review and approval of the relevant procedures? With public money subsidiesOf specific groups are not disadvantaged, the apparent lack of rationality. If the authorization and disbursement of funds used nor transparent, then it lacks legitimacy. May be unfair, but also in other areas. If zone can implement policies similar to the rescue, so outside why not apply the same policy? Regulatory policies should be implemented because of regional features are being carefullyDifference in degrees,? Managers in the Government, it must be recognized by the "no provision impracticable". If these policy grey area is not clearly defined, then we cannot say, Fund subsidized housing is illegal. Since recently, some cities to target specific groups, implementation in a specific area policies such as subsidies and settled in the award of the purchase, is often found inNot fresh. Shenzhen introduced in 2009 subsidies, fellows will receive $ 2 million to a maximum, a one-time payment of $ 600,000 a month after a further 23,000, are higher than most people's wages. This type of policy, of course, highlight the talents of highly recognized social values, but it has caused a number of policy concerns and by reason of doubt. Even if those policies did not have the intention to rescue in disguise,The constraints but still need institutional frameworks. Otherwise diablo 3 gold, it could become law in macro-control policies outside the zone. In fact, for a talented diablo 3 power leveling, really encouraging and favorable environment, is not authorized by the lack of transparency in monetary subsidies, and, on the contrary, is that they can feel perfect and transparent system. This is the precondition of real talent market prosperity. For market regulation, alsoThe case. Gold-line statement: Gold-line reproduced above, does not indicate that confirm the description for investor use only and does not constitute investment advice. Investors a basis for action, at your own risk.