diablo 3 gold 129667837325302892_47 EED

Lost credibility if food safety standards swtor credits, food safety and defense should from built up in recent days, frozen food brand company, three missing, Wan Chai Ferry Pier have "let the cat out of the bag": sampling and Staphylococcus aureus in foods containing health hazard. Push responsibility in law enforcement departments and responsibilities and related enterprise, query and enterprise in a public response to BoYi, to freeze the new national standard cause for concern. 　　According to the new national standard, golden yellow Staphylococcus aureus detection by turned to quantitative and qualitative diablo 3 gold, in other words, allows you to check out a small amount of Staphylococcus aureus in food, and the standards have been a number of companies quoted or even become a shield to prove qualified products. In the food security situation remains serious today, food safety standards are lower and lower? FoodProduct security guarantee? Interests of the consumers who will? 　　Face the public on the new national standard "reverse" questions, health authorities said misreading of new lower standards than the old standard, the new standards with international standards, more in line with international food Microbe sampling requirements. Whether the standard scientific and reasonable, I believe that through rational serious discussions, there will be a final answer. However, every timeFood safety incidents, the public tends to eyes focused on "food safety standard", it is food for thought: should have a neutral objective safety criteria, why has raised public criticism to question? 　　If food safety standards have lost credibility, food safety and defense should from built up? Any standard, is a product of the times, should also keep pace with, andRequirements fit, and adapted to the development phase. However, one cannot avoid the fact is that behind the frequent incidents of food safety, food management in China standards update lag, part of the standard long tread water, twenty or thirty years without change. 　　In fact, many food safety incidents occurred in recent years, are related to this. Of course, over the years, food safety standards is not finished"Remain firm". Many standard argument back on amendments. However, the development of these new standards, often as a general question. The reason is simple: as the standards development participants need considerable expertise, this restriction into the relevant departments and enterprises, experts of "shut the habit". Such standard-setting process, not only deprived the public of the right, the right to participate,Gave the public a "Maoni" conjecture of space. Over the years, whenever the public question the food safety standards are too low, there is always a voice called for standard setting pay attention to the national conditions applicable. This view is not wrong in a strict sense, but sometimes it seems irrelevant. In fact, no one knows a bite to eat in a fat man, will also respect the Chinese "developing" a reality. PublicUnacceptable is that from melamine incident to lean events, many food safety standards already and "State" has nothing to do, the development of China should abandon these outdated food safety standards, but in reality these outdated standards did "peach still smiling spring breeze". Therefore, public concern about food safety, and revitalize the credibility of food safety standards, the relevant departmentsDo more than a simple response, ought to be thinking about development of food safety standards are already behind the times? Standard-setting is open and transparent? 　　Whether the right to develop was "minorities", "a small number of enterprises" abduction? Only similar questions have been answered, and food safety standards don't become public anxiety, can also become a food safety firmly "firewall".